*nix Documentation Project
·  Home
 +   man pages
·  Linux HOWTOs
·  FreeBSD Tips
·  *niX Forums

  man pages->OpenBSD man pages -> perlretut (1)              
Title
Content
Arch
Section
 

PERLRETUT(1)

Contents


NAME    [Toc]    [Back]

       perlretut - Perl regular expressions tutorial

DESCRIPTION    [Toc]    [Back]

       This page provides a basic tutorial on understanding, creating
 and using regular expressions in Perl.  It serves as
       a complement to the reference page on regular expressions
       perlre.  Regular expressions are an integral part of the
       "m//", "s///", "qr//" and "split" operators and so this
       tutorial also overlaps with "Regexp Quote-Like Operators"
       in perlop and "split" in perlfunc.

       Perl is widely renowned for excellence in text processing,
       and regular expressions are one of the big factors behind
       this fame.  Perl regular expressions display an efficiency
       and flexibility unknown in most other computer  languages.
       Mastering even the basics of regular expressions will
       allow you to manipulate text with surprising ease.

       What is a regular expression?  A regular expression is
       simply a string that describes a pattern.  Patterns are in
       common use these days; examples are the patterns typed
       into a search engine to find web pages and the patterns
       used to list files in a directory, e.g., "ls *.txt" or
       "dir *.*".  In Perl, the patterns described by regular
       expressions are used to search strings, extract desired
       parts of strings, and to do search and replace operations.

       Regular expressions have the undeserved reputation of
       being abstract and difficult to understand.  Regular
       expressions are constructed using simple concepts like
       conditionals and loops and are no more difficult to understand
 than the corresponding "if" conditionals and "while"
       loops in the Perl language itself.  In fact, the main
       challenge in learning regular expressions is just getting
       used to the terse notation used to express these concepts.

       This tutorial flattens the learning curve by discussing
       regular expression concepts, along with their notation,
       one at a time and with many examples.  The first part of
       the tutorial will progress from the simplest word searches
       to the basic regular expression concepts.  If you master
       the first part, you will have all the tools needed to
       solve about 98% of your needs.  The second part of the
       tutorial is for those comfortable with the basics and hungry
 for more power tools.  It discusses the more advanced
       regular expression operators and introduces the latest
       cutting edge innovations in 5.6.0.

       A note: to save time, 'regular expression' is often abbreviated
 as regexp or regex.  Regexp is a more natural
       abbreviation than regex, but is harder to pronounce.  The
       Perl pod documentation is evenly split on regexp vs regex;
       in Perl, there is more than one way to abbreviate it.
       We'll use regexp in this tutorial.

Part 1: The basics
       Simple word matching

       The simplest regexp is simply a word, or more generally, a
       string of characters.  A regexp consisting of a word
       matches any string that contains that word:

           "Hello World" =~ /World/;  # matches

       What is this perl statement all about? "Hello World" is a
       simple double quoted string.  "World" is the regular
       expression and the "//" enclosing "/World/" tells perl to
       search a string for a match.  The operator "=~" associates
       the string with the regexp match and produces a true value
       if the regexp matched, or false if the regexp did not
       match.  In our case, "World" matches the second word in
       "Hello World", so the expression is true.  Expressions
       like this are useful in conditionals:

           if ("Hello World" =~ /World/) {
               print "It matches0;
           }
           else {
               print "It doesn't match0;
           }

       There are useful variations on this theme.  The sense of
       the match can be reversed by using "!~" operator:

           if ("Hello World" !~ /World/) {
               print "It doesn't match0;
           }
           else {
               print "It matches0;
           }

       The literal string in the regexp can be replaced by a
       variable:

           $greeting = "World";
           if ("Hello World" =~ /$greeting/) {
               print "It matches0;
           }
           else {
               print "It doesn't match0;
           }

       If you're matching against the special default variable
       $_, the "$_ =~" part can be omitted:
           $_ = "Hello World";
           if (/World/) {
               print "It matches0;
           }
           else {
               print "It doesn't match0;
           }

       And finally, the "//" default delimiters for a match can
       be changed to arbitrary delimiters by putting an 'm' out
       front:

           "Hello  World"  =~ m!World!;   # matches, delimited by
'!'
           "Hello World"  =~  m{World};    #  matches,  note  the
matching '{}'
           "/usr/bin/perl"   =~   m"/perl";   #   matches   after
'/usr/bin',
                                        # '/' becomes an ordinary
char

       "/World/", "m!World!", and "m{World}" all represent the
       same thing.  When, e.g., "" is used as a delimiter, the
       forward slash '/' becomes an ordinary character and can be
       used in a regexp without trouble.

       Let's consider how different regexps would match "Hello
       World":

           "Hello World" =~ /world/;  # doesn't match
           "Hello World" =~ /o W/;    # matches
           "Hello World" =~ /oW/;     # doesn't match
           "Hello World" =~ /World /; # doesn't match

       The first regexp "world" doesn't match because regexps are
       case-sensitive.  The second regexp matches because the
       substring 'o W'  occurs in the string "Hello World" .  The
       space character ' ' is treated like any other character in
       a regexp and is needed to match in this case.  The lack of
       a space character is the reason the third regexp 'oW'
       doesn't match.  The fourth regexp 'World ' doesn't match
       because there is a space at the end of the regexp, but not
       at the end of the string.  The lesson here is that regexps
       must match a part of the string exactly in order for the
       statement to be true.

       If a regexp matches in more than one place in the string,
       perl will always match at the earliest possible point in
       the string:

           "Hello World" =~ /o/;       # matches 'o' in 'Hello'
           "That hat is red" =~ /hat/; # matches 'hat' in 'That'

       With respect to character matching, there are a few more
       points you need to know about.   First of all, not all
       characters can be used 'as is' in a match.  Some characters,
 called metacharacters, are reserved for use in regexp
 notation.  The metacharacters are
           {}[]()^$.|*+?
       The significance of each of these will be explained in the
       rest of the tutorial, but for now, it is important only to
       know that a metacharacter can be matched by putting a
       backslash before it:

           "2+2=4" =~ /2+2/;    # doesn't match, + is a metacharacter
           "2+2=4"  =~  /2+2/;    # matches, + is treated like an
ordinary +
           "The interval is [0,1)." =~ /[0,1)./     # is a syntax
error!
           "The interval is [0,1)." =~ /./  # matches
           "/usr/bin/perl" =~ /usrbinperl/;  # matches

       In the last regexp, the forward slash '/' is also backslashed,
 because it is used to delimit the regexp.  This
       can lead to LTS (leaning toothpick syndrome), however, and
       it is often more readable to change delimiters.

           "/usr/bin/perl" =~ m!/usr/bin/perl!;     #  easier  to
read

       The backslash character '' is a metacharacter itself and
       needs to be backslashed:

           'C:WIN32' =~ /C:\WIN/;   # matches

       In addition to the metacharacters, there are some ASCII
       characters which don't have printable character equivalents
 and are instead represented by escape sequences.
       C"mfor axcarriagerreturnoand ""bfor0afbell.neIfiyour
       "
       string is better thought of as a sequence of arbitrary
       bytes, the octal escape sequence, e.g., " 33", or hexadecimal
 escape sequence, e.g., "B" may be a more natural
 representation for your bytes.  Here are some examples
       of escapes:

           "10002000" =~ m(02)   # matches
           "10000000" =~ /000/   # matches
           "10002000" =~ / 002/ # doesn't match, "0" ne " 00"
           "cat"        =~ /14314/ # matches, but a weird way  to
spell cat

       If you've been around Perl a while, all this talk of
       escape sequences may seem familiar.  Similar escape
       sequences are used in double-quoted strings and in fact
       the regexps in Perl are mostly treated as double-quoted
       strings.  This means that variables can be used in regexps
       as well.  Just like double-quoted strings, the values of
       the variables in the regexp will be substituted in before
       the regexp is evaluated for matching purposes.  So we
       have:
           $foo = 'house';
           'housecat' =~ /$foo/;      # matches
           'cathouse' =~ /cat$foo/;   # matches
           'housecat' =~ /${foo}cat/; # matches

       So far, so good.  With the knowledge above you can already
       perform searches with just about any literal string regexp
       you can dream up.  Here is a very simple emulation of the
       Unix grep program:

           % cat > simple_grep
           #!/usr/bin/perl
           $regexp = shift;
           while (<>) {
               print if /$regexp/;
           }
           ^D

           % chmod +x simple_grep

           % simple_grep abba /usr/dict/words
           Babbage
           cabbage
           cabbages
           sabbath
           Sabbathize
           Sabbathizes
           sabbatical
           scabbard
           scabbards

       This program is easy to understand.  "#!/usr/bin/perl" is
       the standard way to invoke a perl program from the  shell.
       "$regexp = shift;"  saves the first command line argument
       as the regexp to be used, leaving the rest of the command
       line arguments to be treated as files.  "while (<>)"
       loops over all the lines in all the files.  For each line,
       "print if /$regexp/;"  prints the line if the regexp
       matches the line.  In this line, both "print" and "/$regexp/"
 use the default variable $_ implicitly.

       With all of the regexps above, if the regexp matched anywhere
 in the string, it was considered a match.  Sometimes,
 however, we'd like to specify where in the string
       the regexp should try to match.  To do this, we would use
       the anchor metacharacters "^" and "$".  The anchor "^"
       means match at the beginning of the string and the anchor
       "$" means match at the end of the string, or before a newline
 at the end of the string.  Here is how they are used:

           "housekeeper" =~ /keeper/;    # matches
           "housekeeper" =~ /^keeper/;   # doesn't match
           "housekeeper" =~ /keeper$/;   # matches
           "housekeeper0 =~ /keeper$/; # matches
       The second regexp doesn't match because "^" constrains
       "keeper" to match only at the beginning of the string, but
       "housekeeper" has keeper starting in the middle.  The
       third regexp does match, since the "$" constrains "keeper"
       to match only at the end of the string.

       When both "^" and "$" are used at the same time, the regexp
 has to match both the beginning and the end of the
       string, i.e., the regexp matches the whole string.  Consider


           "keeper" =~ /^keep$/;      # doesn't match
           "keeper" =~ /^keeper$/;    # matches
           ""       =~  /^$/;           #  ^$  matches  an  empty
string

       The first regexp doesn't match because the string has more
       to it than "keep".  Since the second regexp is exactly the
       string, it matches.  Using both "^" and "$" in a regexp
       forces the complete string to match, so it gives you complete
 control over which strings match and which don't.
       Suppose you are looking for a fellow named bert, off in a
       string by himself:

           "dogbert"  =~  /bert/;    #  matches, but not what you
want

           "dilbert" =~ /^bert/;  # doesn't match, but ..
           "bertram" =~ /^bert/;  # matches, so  still  not  good
enough

           "bertram" =~ /^bert$/; # doesn't match, good
           "dilbert" =~ /^bert$/; # doesn't match, good
           "bert"    =~ /^bert$/; # matches, perfect

       Of course, in the case of a literal string, one could just
       as easily use the string equivalence "$string eq 'bert'"
       and it would be more efficient.   The  "^...$" regexp
       really becomes useful when we add in the more powerful
       regexp tools below.

       Using character classes    [Toc]    [Back]

       Although one can already do quite a lot with the literal
       string regexps above, we've only scratched the surface of
       regular expression technology.  In this and subsequent
       sections we will introduce regexp concepts (and associated
       metacharacter notations) that will allow a regexp to not
       just represent a single character sequence, but a whole
       class of them.

       One such concept is that of a character class.  A character
 class allows a set of possible characters, rather than
       just a single character, to match at a particular point in
       a regexp.  Character classes are denoted by brackets
       "[...]", with the set of characters to be possibly matched
       inside.  Here are some examples:
           /cat/;       # matches 'cat'
           /[bcr]at/;   # matches 'bat, 'cat', or 'rat'
           /item[0123456789]/;   #  matches  'item0'  or  ...  or
'item9'
           "abc" =~ /[cab]/;    # matches 'a'

       In the last statement, even though 'c' is the first character
 in the class, 'a' matches because the first character
 position in the string is the earliest point at which
       the regexp can match.

           /[yY][eE][sS]/;       # match 'yes' in a case-insensitive way
                                # 'yes', 'Yes', 'YES', etc.

       This regexp displays a common task: perform a case-insensitive
 match.  Perl provides away of avoiding all those
       brackets by simply appending an 'i' to the end of the
       match.  Then "/[yY][eE][sS]/;" can be rewritten as
       "/yes/i;".  The 'i' stands for case-insensitive and is an
       example of a modifier of the matching operation.  We will
       meet other modifiers later in the tutorial.

       We saw in the section above that there were ordinary characters,
 which represented themselves, and special characters,
 which needed a backslash "
       selves.  The same is true in a character class, but the
       sets of ordinary and special characters inside a character
       class are different than those outside a character  class.
       The special characters for a character class are "-]$".
       "]" is special because it denotes the end of a character
       class.  "$" is special because it denotes a scalar variable.
  "
       sequences, just like above.  Here is how the special characters
 "]$

          /[]c]def/; # matches ']def' or 'cdef'
          $x = 'bcr';
          /[$x]at/;   # matches 'bat', 'cat', or 'rat'
          /[]at/;  # matches '$at' or 'xat'
          /[\$x]at/; # matches 't', 'bat, 'cat', or 'rat'

       The last two are a little tricky.  in "[]", the backslash
 protects the dollar sign, so the character class has
       two members "$" and "x".  In "[\$x]", the backslash is
       protected, so $x is treated as a variable and substituted
       in double quote fashion.

       The special character '-' acts as a range operator within
       character classes, so that a contiguous set of characters
       can be written as a range.  With ranges, the unwieldy
       "[0123456789]" and "[abc...xyz]" become the svelte "[0-9]"
       and "[a-z]".  Some examples are
           /item[0-9]/;  # matches 'item0' or ... or 'item9'
           /[0-9bx-z]aa/;  # matches '0aa', ..., '9aa',
                           # 'baa', 'xaa', 'yaa', or 'zaa'
           /[0-9a-fA-F]/;  # matches a hexadecimal digit
           /[0-9a-zA-Z_]/; # matches a "word" character,
                           # like those in a perl variable name

       If '-' is the first or last character in a character
       class, it is treated as an ordinary character; "[-ab]",
       "[ab-]" and "[a-b]" are all equivalent.

       The special character "^" in the first position of a character
 class denotes a negated character class, which
       matches any character but those in the brackets.  Both
       "[...]" and "[^...]" must match a character, or the match
       fails.  Then

           /[^a]at/;  # doesn't match 'aat' or 'at', but matches
                      # all other 'bat', 'cat, '0at', '%at', etc.
           /[^0-9]/;  # matches a non-numeric character
           /[a^]at/;  # matches 'aat' or '^at'; here '^' is ordinary

       Now, even "[0-9]" can be a bother the write multiple
       times, so in the interest of saving keystrokes and making
       regexps more readable, Perl has several abbreviations for
       common character classes:

       o    is a digit and represents [0-9]

0f]    o     is   a   whitespace   character   and  represents  [


       o   48a word character (alphanumeric or _) and represents
 [0-9a-zA-Z_]

       o   a negated ; it represents any character but a
           digit [^0-9]

       o   is a negated t represents any non-whitespace
           character [^
       o   W is a negated 840
           ter [^0

       o   The period '.' matches any character but "0

       The "28
       and outside of character classes.  Here are some in use:
        .
PERLRETUT(1)     Perl Programmers Reference Guide    PERLRETUT(1)
        h
        i
        s  /::/; # matches a hh:mm:ss time format
        m  /[         # matches any digit or whitespace character
        a  /96
        t                    #  non-word char, followed by a word
char    c
        h  /..rt/;           # matches any two chars, followed by
'rt'    e
        s  /end./;          # matches 'end.'
        a  /end[.]/;         # same thing, matches 'end.'
        b
       Bocause a period is a metacharacter, it needs to be
       eucaped to mat;h as an ordinary period. Because, for exampne,
 "" and "9#0
       td think of "[m960
       DaMorgan's lawa.
        r            t
       Ay anchor usefcl in basic regexps is the word anchor
       "b            h
       and a non-wardecharacter "14424
        t         t  s
        w  $x = "H/usccat catenates house and cat";
        e  $x =~ /;ata;    # matches cat in 'housecat'
        e  $x =~ /#het cat in 'catenates'
        n  $x =~ /caati
        a  $x =~ /t  n
        w         t  '
       Note in the last example, the end of the string is considered
 a word boundary.
        d            u
       You might wonder why '.' matches everything but "0 - why
       not every character? The reason is that often one is
       matching against lines and would like to ignore the newline
 characters.  For instance, while the string "0 represents
 one line, we would like to think of as empty.
       Then          '
        t
        e  ""   =~ /^$/;    # matches
        r  "0 =~ /^$/;    # matches, "0 is ignored

           ""   =~ /./;      # doesn't match; it needs a char
           ""   =~ /^.$/;    # doesn't match; it needs a char
           "0 =~ /^.$/;    # doesn't match; it needs a char other
than "0
           "a"  =~ /^.$/;    # matches
           "a0  =~ /^.$/;  # matches, ignores the "0

       This behavior is convenient, because we usually want to
       ignore newlines when we count and match characters in a
       line.  Sometimes, however, we want to keep track of newlines.
  We might even want "^" and "$" to anchor at the
       beginning and end of lines within the string, rather than
       just the beginning and end of the string.  Perl allows us
       to choose between ignoring and paying attention to newlines
 by using the "//s" and "//m" modifiers.  "//s" and
       "//m" stand for single line and multi-line and they determine
 whether a string is to be treated as one continuous
       string, or as a set of lines.  The two modifiers affect
       two aspects of how the regexp is interpreted: 1) how the
       '.' character class is defined, and 2) where the anchors
       "^" and "$" are able to match.  Here are the four possible
       combinations:

       o   no modifiers (//): Default behavior.  '.' matches any
           character except "0.  "^" matches only at the beginning
 of the string and "$" matches only at the end or
           before a newline at the end.

       o   s modifier (//s): Treat string as a single long  line.
           '.' matches any character, even "0.  "^" matches
           only at the beginning of the string and "$" matches
           only at the end or before a newline at the end.

       o   m modifier (//m): Treat string as a set of multiple
           lines.  '.'  matches any character except "0.  "^"
           and "$" are able to match at the start or end of any
           line within the string.

       o   both s and m modifiers (//sm): Treat string as a single
 long line, but detect multiple lines.  '.' matches
           any character, even "0.  "^" and "$", however, are
           able to match at the start or end of any line within
           the string.

       Here are examples of "//s" and "//m" in action:

           $x = "There once was a girl0ho programmed in Perl0;

           $x =~ /^Who/;   # doesn't match, "Who" not at start of
string
           $x =~ /^Who/s;  # doesn't match, "Who" not at start of
string
           $x =~ /^Who/m;  # matches, "Who" at  start  of  second
line
           $x  =~  /^Who/sm;  # matches, "Who" at start of second
line

           $x =~ /girl.Who/;   # doesn't match, "." doesn't match
"0
           $x =~ /girl.Who/s;  # matches, "." matches "0
           $x =~ /girl.Who/m;  # doesn't match, "." doesn't match
"0
           $x =~ /girl.Who/sm; # matches, "." matches "0

       Most of the time, the default behavior is what is want,
       but "//s" and "//m" are occasionally very useful.  If
       "//m" is being used, the start of the string can still be
       matched with "0       matched with the anchors " (matchtheboth the end and
newline before, like "$"), and ""(matches only the
       end):

           $x  =~  /^Who/m;   # matches, "Who" at start of second
line
           $x =~ /0ho" is not at start of string

           $x =~ /girl$/m;  # matches, "girl"  at  end  of  first
line
           $x =~ /girlm; # doesn't match, "girl" is not at end of string
           $x  =~  /Perlm; # matche$x =~e/Perl/m;a# doesn't match, end
"Perl" is not at end of string

       We now know how to create choices among classes of characters
 in a regexp.  What about choices among words or character
 strings? Such choices are described in the next section.


       Matching this or that    [Toc]    [Back]

       Sometimes we would like to our regexp to be able to match
       different possible words or character strings.  This is
       accomplished by using the alternation metacharacter "|".
       To match "dog" or "cat", we form the regexp "dog|cat".  As
       before, perl will try to match the regexp at the earliest
       possible point in the string.  At each character position,
       perl will first try to match the first alternative, "dog".
       If "dog" doesn't match, perl will then try the next alternative,
 "cat".  If "cat" doesn't match either, then the
       match fails and perl moves to the next position in the
       string.  Some examples:

           "cats and dogs" =~ /cat|dog|bird/;  # matches "cat"
           "cats and dogs" =~ /dog|cat|bird/;  # matches "cat"

       Even though "dog" is the first alternative in the second
       regexp, "cat" is able to match earlier in the string.

           "cats"          =~ /c|ca|cat|cats/; # matches "c"
           "cats"          =~ /cats|cat|ca|c/; # matches "cats"

       Here, all the alternatives match at the first string position,
 so the first alternative is the one that matches.
       If some of the alternatives are truncations of the others,
       put the longest ones first to give them a chance to match.

           "cab" =~ /a|b|c/ # matches "c"
                            # /a|b|c/ == /[abc]/

       The last example points out that character classes are
       like alternations of characters.  At a given character
       position, the first alternative that allows the regexp
       match to succeed will be the one that matches.

       Grouping things and hierarchical matching    [Toc]    [Back]

       Alternation allows a regexp to choose among alternatives,
       but by itself it unsatisfying.  The reason is that each
       alternative is a whole regexp, but sometime we want alternatives
 for just part of a regexp.  For instance, suppose
       we want to search for housecats or housekeepers.  The regexp
 "housecat|housekeeper" fits the bill, but is inefficient
 because we had to type "house" twice.  It would be
       nice to have parts of the regexp be constant, like
       "house", and some parts have alternatives, like
       "cat|keeper".

       The grouping metacharacters "()" solve this problem.
       Grouping allows parts of a regexp to be treated as a single
 unit.  Parts of a regexp are grouped by enclosing them
       in parentheses.  Thus we could solve the "housecat|housekeeper"
 by forming the regexp as "house(cat|keeper)".  The
       regexp "house(cat|keeper)" means match "house" followed by
       either "cat" or "keeper".  Some more examples are

           /(a|b)b/;    # matches 'ab' or 'bb'
           /(ac|b)b/;   # matches 'acb' or 'bb'
           /(^a|b)c/;   # matches 'ac' at start of string or 'bc'
anywhere
           /(a|[bc])d/; # matches 'ad', 'bd', or 'cd'

           /house(cat|)/;  # matches either 'housecat' or 'house'
           /house(cat(s|)|)/;   #  matches  either 'housecats' or
'housecat' or
                               # 'house'.   Note  groups  can  be
nested.

           /(19|20|)/;   #  match  years  19xx,  20xx, or the Y2K
problem, xx
           "20" =~ /(19|20|)/;  # matches  the  null  alternative
'()',
                                    # because '20' can't match

       Alternations behave the same way in groups as out of them:
       at a given string position, the leftmost alternative that
       allows the regexp to match is taken.  So in the last example
 at the first string position, "20" matches the second
       alternative, but there is nothing left over to match the
       next two digits "".  So perl moves on to the next
       alternative, which is the null alternative and that works,
       since "20" is two digits.

       The process of trying one alternative, seeing if it
       matches, and moving on to the next alternative if it
       doesn't, is called backtracking.  The term 'backtracking'
       comes from the idea that matching a regexp is like a walk
       in the woods.  Successfully matching a regexp is like
       arriving at a destination.  There are many possible trailheads,
 one for each string position, and each one is tried
       in order, left to right.  From each trailhead there may be
       many paths, some of which get you there, and some which
       are dead ends.  When you walk along a trail and hit a dead
       end, you have to backtrack along the trail to an earlier
       point to try another trail.  If you hit your destination,
       you stop immediately and forget about trying all the other
       trails.  You are persistent, and only if you have tried
       all the trails from all the trailheads and not arrived at
       your destination, do you declare failure.  To be concrete,
       here is a step-by-step analysis of what perl does when it
       tries to match the regexp

           "abcde" =~ /(abd|abc)(df|d|de)/;
       0   Start with the first letter in the string 'a'.

       1   Try the first alternative in the first group 'abd'.

       2   Match 'a' followed by 'b'. So far so good.

       3   'd' in the regexp doesn't match 'c' in the string - a
           dead end.  So backtrack two characters and pick the
           second alternative in the first group 'abc'.

       4   Match 'a' followed by 'b' followed by 'c'.  We are on
           a roll and have satisfied the first group. Set $1 to
           'abc'.

       5   Move on to the second group and pick the first alternative
 'df'.

       6   Match the 'd'.

       7   'f' in the regexp doesn't match 'e' in the string, so
           a dead end.  Backtrack one character and pick the second
 alternative in the second group 'd'.

       8   'd' matches. The second grouping is satisfied, so set
           $2 to 'd'.

       9   We are at the end of the regexp, so we are done! We
           have matched 'abcd' out of the string "abcde".

       There  are a couple of things to note about this analysis.
       First, the third alternative in the second group 'de' also
       allows a match, but we stopped before we got to it - at a
       given character position, leftmost wins.  Second, we were
       able to get a match at the first character position of the
       string 'a'.  If there were no matches at the first position,
 perl would move to the second character position 'b'
       and attempt the match all over again.  Only when all possible
 paths at all possible character positions have been
       exhausted does perl give up and declare
       "$string =~ /(abd|abc)(df|d|de)/;"  to be false.

       Even with all this work, regexp matching happens remarkably
 fast.  To speed things up, during compilation stage,
       perl compiles the regexp into a compact sequence of
       opcodes that can often fit inside a processor cache.  When
       the code is executed, these opcodes can then run at full
       throttle and search very quickly.

       Extracting matches    [Toc]    [Back]

       The grouping metacharacters "()" also serve another completely
 different function: they allow the extraction of
       the parts of a string that matched.  This is very useful
       to find out what matched and for text processing in
       general.  For each grouping, the part that matched inside
       goes into the special variables $1, $2, etc.  They can be
       used just as ordinary variables:

           # extract hours, minutes, seconds
           if ($time =~ /():():()/) {    # match hh:mm:ss format
               $hours = $1;
               $minutes = $2;
               $seconds = $3;
           }

       Now, we know that in scalar context,
       "$time =~ /():():()/"  returns a true or false
       value.  In list context, however, it returns the list of
       matched values "($1,$2,$3)".  So we could write the code
       more compactly as

           # extract hours, minutes, seconds
           ($hours, $minutes, $second) = ($time =~ /():():()/);

       If the groupings in a regexp are nested, $1 gets the group
       with the leftmost opening parenthesis, $2 the next opening
       parenthesis, etc.  For example, here is a complex regexp
       and the matching variables indicated below it:

           /(ab(cd|ef)((gi)|j))/;
            1  2      34

       so that if the regexp matched, e.g., $2 would contain 'cd'
       or 'ef'. For convenience, perl sets $+ to the string held
       by the highest numbered $1, $2, ... that got assigned
       (and, somewhat related, $^N to the value of the $1, $2,
       ... most-recently assigned; i.e. the $1, $2, ... associated
 with the rightmost closing parenthesis used in the
       match).

       Closely associated with the matching variables $1, $2, ...
       are the backreferences "1", "2", ... .  Backreferences
       are simply matching variables that can be used inside a
       regexp.  This is a really nice feature - what matches
       later in a regexp can depend on what matched earlier in
       the regexp.  Suppose we wanted to look for doubled words
       in text, like 'the the'.  The following regexp finds all
       3-letter doubles with a space in between:

           /(24

       The grouping assigns a value to 1, so that the same 3
       letter sequence is used for both parts.  Here are some
       words with repeated parts:
           % simple_grep '^(24
           beriberi
           booboo
           coco
           mama
           murmur
           papa

       The regexp has a single grouping which considers 4-letter
       combinations, then 3-letter combinations, etc.  and uses
       "1" to look for a repeat.  Although $1 and "1" represent
       the same thing, care should be taken to use matched variables
 $1, $2, ... only outside a regexp and backreferences
       "1", "2", ... only inside a regexp; not doing so may
       lead to surprising and/or undefined results.

       In addition to what was matched, Perl 5.6.0 also provides
       the positions of what was matched with the "@-" and "@+"
       arrays. "$-[0]" is the position of the start of the entire
       match and $+[0] is the position of the end. Similarly,
       "$-[n]" is the position of the start of the $n match and
       $+[n] is the position of the end. If $n is undefined, so
       are "$-[n]" and $+[n]. Then this code

           $x = "Mmm...donut, thought Homer";
           $x =~ /^(Mmm|Yech)...(donut|peas)/; # matches
           foreach $expr (1..$#-) {
               print  "Match  $expr:   '${$expr}'   at   position
($-[$expr],$+[$expr])0;
           }

       prints

           Match 1: 'Mmm' at position (0,3)
           Match 2: 'donut' at position (6,11)

       Even if there are no groupings in a regexp, it is still
       possible to find out what exactly matched in a string.  If
       you use them, perl will set $` to the part of the string
       before the match, will set $& to the part of the string
       that matched, and will set $' to the part of the string
       after the match.  An example:

           $x = "the cat caught the mouse";
           $x =~ /cat/;  # $` = 'the ', $& = 'cat', $' = ' caught
the mouse'
           $x =~ /the/;  # $` = '', $& = 'the', $' = ' cat caught
the mouse'

       In the second match, "$` = ''"  because the regexp matched
       at the first character position in the string and stopped,
       it never saw the second 'the'.  It is important to note
       that using $` and $' slows down regexp matching quite a
       bit, and  $&  slows it down to a lesser extent, because if
       they are used in one regexp in a program, they are generated
 for <all> regexps in the program.  So if raw performance
 is a goal of your application, they should be
       avoided.  If you need them, use "@-" and "@+" instead:

           $` is the same as substr( $x, 0, $-[0] )
           $& is the same as substr( $x, $-[0], $+[0]-$-[0] )
           $' is the same as substr( $x, $+[0] )

       Matching repetitions    [Toc]    [Back]

       The examples in the previous section display an annoying
       weakness.  We were only matching 3-letter words, or syllables
 of 4 letters or less.  We'd like to be able to match
       words or syllables of any length, without writing out
       tedious alternatives like "24

       This is exactly the problem the quantifier metacharacters
       "?", "*", "+", and "{}" were created for.  They allow us
       to determine the number of repeats of a portion of a regexp
 we consider to be a match.  Quantifiers are put immediately
 after the character, character class, or grouping
       that we want to specify.  They have the following meanings:


       o   "a?" = match 'a' 1 or 0 times

       o   "a*" = match 'a' 0 or more times, i.e., any number of
           times

       o   "a+" = match 'a' 1 or more times, i.e., at least once

       o   "a{n,m}" = match at least "n" times, but not more than
           "m" times.

       o   "a{n,}" = match at least "n" or more times

       o   "a{n}" = match exactly "n" times

       Here are some examples:

           /[a-z]+*/;   #  match  a lowercase word, at least some
space, and
                            # any number of digits
           /(1152
           /y(es)?/i;       # matches 'y', 'Y', or a  case-insensitive 'yes'
           $year  =~ /{2,4}/;  # make sure year is at least 2 but
not more
                                # than 4 digits
           $year =~ /{4}|{2}/;    # better  match;  throw  out  3
digit dates
           $year =~ /{2}({2})?/;  # same thing written differently. However,
                                      # this produces $1 and  the
other does not.
           % simple_grep '^(1032
           beriberi
           booboo
           coco
           mama
           murmur
           papa

       For all of these quantifiers, perl will try to match as
       much of the string as possible, while still allowing the
       regexp to succeed.  Thus with "/a?.../", perl will first
       try to match the regexp with the "a" present; if that
       fails, perl will try to match the regexp without the "a"
       present.  For the quantifier "*", we get the following:

           $x = "the cat in the hat";
           $x =~ /^(.*)(cat)(.*)$/; # matches,
                                    # $1 = 'the '
                                    # $2 = 'cat'
                                    # $3 = ' in the hat'

       Which is what we might expect, the match finds the only
       "cat" in the string and locks onto it.  Consider, however,
       this regexp:

           $x =~ /^(.*)(at)(.*)$/; # matches,
                                   # $1 = 'the cat in the h'
                                   # $2 = 'at'
                                   # $3 = ''   (0 matches)

       One might initially guess that perl would find the "at" in
       "cat" and stop there, but that wouldn't give the longest
       possible string to the first quantifier ".*".  Instead,
       the first quantifier ".*" grabs as much of the string as
       possible while still having the regexp match.  In this
       example, that means having the "at" sequence with the
       final "at" in the string.  The other important principle
       illustrated here is that when there are two or more elements
 in a regexp, the leftmost quantifier, if there is
       one, gets to grab as much the string as possible, leaving
       the rest of the regexp to fight over scraps.  Thus in our
       example, the first quantifier ".*" grabs most of the
       string, while the second quantifier ".*" gets the empty
       string.   Quantifiers that grab as much of the string as
       possible are called maximal match or greedy quantifiers.

       When a regexp can match a string in several different
       ways, we can use the principles above to predict which way
       the regexp will match:

       o   Principle 0: Taken as a whole, any regexp will be
           matched at the earliest possible position in the
           string.
       o   Principle 1: In an alternation "a|b|c...", the leftmost
 alternative that allows a match for the whole
           regexp will be the one used.

       o   Principle 2: The maximal matching quantifiers "?",
           "*", "+" and "{n,m}" will in general match as much of
           the string as possible while still allowing the whole
           regexp to match.

       o   Principle 3: If there are two or more elements in a
           regexp, the leftmost greedy quantifier, if any, will
           match as much of the string as possible while still
           allowing the whole regexp to match.  The next leftmost
           greedy quantifier, if any, will try to match as much
           of the string remaining available to it as possible,
           while still allowing the whole regexp to match.  And
           so on, until all the regexp elements are satisfied.

       As we have seen above, Principle 0 overrides the others -
       the regexp will be matched as early as possible, with the
       other principles determining how the regexp matches at
       that earliest character position.

       Here is an example of these principles in action:

           $x = "The programming republic of Perl";
           $x =~ /^(.+)(e|r)(.*)$/;  # matches,
                                     #  $1 = 'The programming republic of Pe'
                                     # $2 = 'r'
                                     # $3 = 'l'

       This regexp matches at the earliest string position,  'T'.
       One might think that "e", being leftmost in the alternation,
 would be matched, but "r" produces the longest
       string in the first quantifier.

           $x =~ /(m{1,2})(.*)$/;  # matches,
                                   # $1 = 'mm'
                                   # $2 = 'ing republic of Perl'

       Here, The earliest possible match is at the first 'm' in
       "programming". "m{1,2}" is the first quantifier, so it
       gets to match a maximal "mm".

           $x =~ /.*(m{1,2})(.*)$/;  # matches,
                                     # $1 = 'm'
                                     #  $2  =  'ing  republic  of
Perl'

       Here, the regexp matches at the start of the string. The
       first quantifier ".*" grabs as much as possible, leaving
       just a single 'm' for the second quantifier "m{1,2}".
           $x =~ /(.?)(m{1,2})(.*)$/;  # matches,
                                       # $1 = 'a'
                                       # $2 = 'mm'
                                       # $3 =  'ing  republic  of
Perl'

       Here, ".?" eats its maximal one character at the earliest
       possible position in the string, 'a' in "programming",
       leaving "m{1,2}" the opportunity to match both "m"'s.
       Finally,

           "aXXXb" =~ /(X*)/; # matches with $1 = ''

       because it can match zero copies of 'X' at the beginning
       of the string.  If you definitely want to match at least
       one 'X', use "X+", not "X*".

       Sometimes greed is not good.  At times, we would like
       quantifiers to match a minimal piece of string, rather
       than a maximal piece.  For this purpose, Larry Wall created
 the minimal match  or non-greedy quantifiers
       "??","*?", "+?", and "{}?".  These are the usual quantifiers
 with a "?" appended to them.  They have the following
 meanings:

       o   "a??" = match 'a' 0 or 1 times. Try 0 first, then 1.

       o   "a*?" = match 'a' 0 or more times, i.e., any number of
           times, but as few times as possible

       o   "a+?" = match 'a' 1 or more times, i.e., at least
           once, but as few times as possible

       o   "a{n,m}?" = match at least "n" times, not more than
           "m" times, as few times as possible

       o   "a{n,}?" = match at least "n" times, but as few times
           as possible

       o   "a{n}?" = match exactly "n" times.  Because we match
           exactly "n" times, "a{n}?" is equivalent to "a{n}" and
           is just there for notational consistency.

       Let's look at the example above, but with minimal quantifiers:


           $x = "The programming republic of Perl";
           $x =~ /^(.+?)(e|r)(.*)$/; # matches,
                                     # $1 = 'Th'
                                     # $2 = 'e'
                                     #  $3 = ' programming republic of Perl'

       The minimal string that will allow both the start of the
       string "^" and the alternation to match is "Th", with the
       alternation "e|r" matching "e".  The second quantifier
       ".*" is free to gobble up the rest of the string.

           $x =~ /(m{1,2}?)(.*?)$/;  # matches,
                                     # $1 = 'm'
                                     # $2  =  'ming  republic  of
Perl'

       The first string position that this regexp can match is at
       the first 'm' in "programming". At this position, the minimal
 "m{1,2}?"  matches just one 'm'.  Although the second
       quantifier ".*?" would prefer to match no characters, it
       is constrained by the end-of-string anchor "$" to match
       the rest of the string.

           $x =~ /(.*?)(m{1,2}?)(.*)$/;  # matches,
                                         # $1 = 'The progra'
                                         # $2 = 'm'
                                         # $3 = 'ming republic of
Perl'

       In this regexp, you might expect the first minimal quantifier
 ".*?"  to match the empty string, because it is not
       constrained by a "^" anchor to match the beginning of the
       word.  Principle 0 applies here, however.  Because it is
       possible for the whole regexp to match at the start of the
       string, it will match at the start of the string.  Thus
       the first quantifier has to match everything up to the
       first "m".  The second minimal quantifier matches just one
       "m" and the third quantifier matches the rest of the
       string.

           $x =~ /(.??)(m{1,2})(.*)$/;  # matches,
                                        # $1 = 'a'
                                        # $2 = 'mm'
                                        # $3 = 'ing  republic  of
Perl'

       Just as in the previous regexp, the first quantifier ".??"
       can match earliest at position 'a', so it does.  The second
 quantifier is greedy, so it matches "mm", and the
       third matches the rest of the string.

       We can modify principle 3 above to take into account nongreedy
 quantifiers:

       o   Principle 3: If there are two or more elements in a
           regexp, the leftmost greedy (non-greedy) quantifier,
           if any, will match as much (little) of the string as
           possible while still allowing the whole regexp to
           match.  The next leftmost greedy (non-greedy) quantifier,
 if any, will try to match as much (little) of
           the string remaining available to it as possible,
           while still allowing the whole regexp to match.  And
           so on, until all the regexp elements are satisfied.

       Just like alternation, quantifiers are also susceptible to
       backtracking.  Here is a step-by-step analysis of the
       example

           $x = "the cat in the hat";
           $x =~ /^(.*)(at)(.*)$/; # matches,
                                   # $1 = 'the cat in the h'
                                   # $2 = 'at'
                                   # $3 = ''   (0 matches)

       0   Start with the first letter in the string 't'.

       1   The first quantifier '.*' starts out by matching the
           whole string 'the cat in the hat'.

       2   'a' in the regexp element 'at' doesn't match the end
           of the string.  Backtrack one character.

       3   'a' in the regexp element 'at' still doesn't match the
           last letter of the string 't', so backtrack one more
           character.

       4   Now we can match the 'a' and the 't'.

       5   Move on to the third element '.*'.  Since we are at
           the end of the string and '.*' can match 0 times,
           assign it the empty string.

       6   We are done!

       Most of the time, all this moving forward and backtracking
       happens quickly and searching is fast.   There are some
       pathological regexps, however, whose execution time exponentially
 grows with the size of the string.  A typical
       structure that blows up in your face is of the form

           /(a|b+)*/;

       The problem is the nested indeterminate quantifiers.
       There are many different ways of partitioning a string of
       length n between the "+" and "*": one repetition with "b+"
       of length n, two repetitions with the first "b+" length k
       and the second with length n-k, m repetitions whose bits
       add up to length n, etc.  In fact there are an exponential
       number of ways to partition a string as a function of
       length.  A regexp may get lucky and match early in the
       process, but if there is no match, perl will try every
       possibility before giving up.  So be careful with nested
       "*"'s, "{n,m}"'s, and "+"'s.  The book Mastering regular
       expressions by Jeffrey Friedl gives a wonderful discussion
       of this and other efficiency issues.

       Building a regexp    [Toc]    [Back]

       At this point, we have all the basic regexp concepts covered,
 so let's give a more involved example of a regular
       expression.  We will build a regexp that matches  numbers.

       The first task in building a regexp is to decide what we
       want to match and what we want to exclude.  In our case,
       we want to match both integers and floating point numbers
       and we want to reject any string that isn't a number.

       The next task is to break the problem down into smaller
       problems that are easily converted into a regexp.

       The simplest case is integers.  These consist of a
       sequence of digits, with an optional sign in front.  The
       digits we can represent with "+" and the sign can be
       matched with "[+-]".  Thus the integer regexp is

           /[+-]?+/;  # matches integers

       A floating point number potentially has a sign, an integral
 part, a decimal point, a fractional part, and an
       exponent.  One or more of these parts is optional, so we
       need to check out the different possibilities.  Floating
       point numbers which are in proper form include 123.,
       0.345, .34, -1e6, and 25.4E-72.  As with integers, the
       sign out front is completely optional and can be matched
       by "[+-]?".  We can see that if there is no exponent,
       floating point numbers must have a decimal point, otherwise
 they are integers.  We might be tempted to model
       these with "*.*", but this would also match just a
       single decimal point, which is not a number.  So the three
       cases of floating point number sans exponent are

          /[+-]?+./;  # 1., 321., etc.
          /[+-]?.+/;  # .1, .234, etc.
          /[+-]?+.+/;  # 1.0, 30.56, etc.

       These can be combined into a single regexp with a threeway
 alternation:

          /[+-]?(+.+|+.|.+)/;  # floating point, no exponent

       In this alternation, it is important to put '+.+'
       before '+.'.  If '+.' were first, the regexp would
       happily match that and ignore the fractional part of the
       number.

       Now consider floating point numbers with exponents.  The
       key observation here is that both integers and numbers
       with decimal points are allowed in front of an exponent.
       Then exponents, like the overall sign, are independent of
       whether we are matching numbers with or without decimal
       points, and can be 'decoupled' from the mantissa.  The
       overall form of the regexp now becomes clear:

           /^(optional sign)(integer  |  f.p.  mantissa)(optional
exponent)$/;
       The exponent is an "e" or "E", followed by an integer.  So
       the exponent regexp is

          /[eE][+-]?+/;  # exponent

       Putting all the parts together, we get a regexp that
       matches numbers:

          /^[+-]?(+.+|+.|.+|+)([eE][+-]?+)?$/;  # Ta da!

       Long regexps like this may impress your friends, but can
       be hard to decipher.  In complex situations like this, the
       "//x" modifier for a match is invaluable.  It allows one
       to put nearly arbitrary whitespace and comments into a
       regexp without affecting their meaning.  Using it, we can
       rewrite our 'extended' regexp in the more pleasing form

          /^
             [+-]?         # first, match an optional sign
             (              # then match integers or f.p. mantissas:
                 +.+  # mantissa of the form a.b
                |+.     # mantissa of the form a.
                |.+     # mantissa of the form .b
                |+       # integer of the form a
             )
             ([eE][+-]?+)?  # finally, optionally match an  exponent
          $/x;

       If whitespace is mostly irrelevant, how does one include
       space characters in an extended regexp? The answer is to
       backslash it ' '  or put it in a character class "[ ]" .
       The  same  thing goes for pound signs, use "       For instance, Perl allows a space between the sign and the
       mantissa/integer, and we could add this to our regexp as
       follows:

          /^
             [+-]? *      # first, match an  optional  sign  *and
space*
             (              # then match integers or f.p. mantissas:
                 +.+  # mantissa of the form a.b
                |+.     # mantissa of the form a.
                |.+     # mantissa of the form .b
                |+       # integer of the form a
             )
             ([eE][+-]?+)?  # finally, optionally match an  exponent
          $/x;

       In this form, it is easier to see a way to simplify the
       alternation.  Alternatives 1, 2, and 4 all start with
       "+", so it could be factored out:
          /^
             [+-]? *      # first, match an optional sign
             (              # then match integers or f.p. mantissas:
                 +       # start out with a ...
                 (
                     .* # mantissa of the form a.b or a.
                 )?        # ? takes care of integers of the form
a
                |.+     # mantissa of the form .b
             )
             ([eE][+-]?+)?   # finally, optionally match an exponent
          $/x;

       or written in the compact form,

           /^[+-]? *(+(.*)?|.+)([eE][+-]?+)?$/;

       This is our final regexp.  To recap, we built a regexp by

       o   specifying the task in detail,

       o   breaking down the problem into smaller parts,

       o   translating the small parts into regexps,

       o   combining the regexps,

       o   and optimizing the final combined regexp.

       These are also the typical steps involved in writing a
       computer program.  This makes perfect sense, because regular
 expressions are essentially programs written a little
       computer language that specifies patterns.

       Using regular expressions in Perl    [Toc]    [Back]

       The last topic of Part 1 briefly covers how regexps are
       used in Perl programs.  Where do they fit into Perl syntax?


       We have already introduced the matching operator in its
       default "/regexp/" and arbitrary delimiter "m!regexp!"
       forms.  We have used the binding operator "=~" and its
       negation "!~" to test for string matches.  Associated with
       the matching operator, we have discussed the single line
       "//s", multi-line "//m", case-insensitive "//i" and
       extended "//x" modifiers.

       There are a few more things you might want to know about
       matching operators.  First, we pointed out earlier that
       variables in regexps are substituted before the regexp is
       evaluated:
           $pattern = 'Seuss';
           while (<>) {
               print if /$pattern/;
           }

       This will print any lines containing the word "Seuss".  It
       is not as efficient as it could be, however, because perl
       has to re-evaluate $pattern each time through the loop.
       If $pattern won't be changing over the lifetime of the
       script, we can add the "//o" modifier, which directs perl
       to only perform variable substitutions once:

           #!/usr/bin/perl
           #    Improved simple_grep
           $regexp = shift;
           while (<>) {
               print if /$regexp/o;  # a good deal faster
           }

       If you change $pattern after the first substitution happens,
 perl will ignore it.  If you don't want any substitutions
 at all, use the special delimiter "m''":

           @pattern = ('Seuss');
           while (<>) {
               print  if  m'@pattern';   # matches literal '@pattern', not 'Seuss'
           }

       "m''" acts like single quotes on a regexp; all other "m"
       delimiters act like double quotes.  If the regexp evaluates
 to the empty string, the regexp in the last success-
       ful match is used instead.  So we have

           "dog" =~ /d/;  # 'd' matches
           "dogbert =~ //;  # this matches the  'd'  regexp  used
before

       The final two modifiers "//g" and "//c" concern multiple
       matches.  The modifier "//g" stands for global matching
       and allows the matching operator to match within a string
       as many times as possible.  In scalar context, successive
       invocations against a string will have `"//g" jump from
       match to match, keeping track of position in the string as
       it goes along.  You can get or set the position with the
       "pos()" function.

       The use of "//g" is shown in the following example.  Suppose
 we have a string that consists of words separated by
       spaces.  If we know how many words there are in advance,
       we could extract the words using groupings:
           $x = "cat dog house"; # 3 words
           $x =~ /^(24
                                                  # $1 = 'cat'
                                                  # $2 = 'dog'
                                                  # $3 = 'house'

       But what if we had an indeterminate number of words? This
       is the sort of task "//g" was made for.  To extract all
       words, form the simple regexp "(480
       matches with "/(120

           while ($x =~ /(144
               print "Word is $1, ends at position ", pos $x, "0;
           }

       prints

           Word is cat, ends at position 3
           Word is dog, ends at position 7
           Word is house, ends at position 13

       A failed match or changing the target string resets the
       position.  If you don't want the position reset after
   

 Similar pages
Name OS Title
perlre IRIX Perl regular expressions
perlre OpenBSD Perl regular expressions
perlreref OpenBSD Perl Regular Expressions Reference
perlrequick OpenBSD Perl regular expressions quick start
libpcre Linux Perl-compatible regular expressions: expresion syntax.
re_exec Tru64 Handle regular expressions
re_comp Tru64 Handle regular expressions
regex Linux POSIX 1003.2 regular expressions
re_format OpenBSD POSIX 1003.2 regular expressions
re_format FreeBSD POSIX 1003.2 regular expressions
Copyright © 2004-2005 DeniX Solutions SRL
newsletter delivery service